New Jersey Attempts To Criminalize Pro Gun Speech

The “Garden State” which is best known for its high property and sales taxes and disastrous overall ranking (49) for “fiscal stability” and “overall quality of life,” can now add willfully thrashing our First and Second Amendments to its list of accomplishments.

In New Jersey, the anti-gun fervor reached a new height with progressive lawmakers upping the ante by signing new legislation that would actually “criminalize free speech” regarding our  Second Amendment.

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

The new law makes it a crime if you attempt to communicate online regarding certain firearms. The law specifically targets individuals who attempt to either communicate and or provide instructions to other individuals online, on how to print out plans for the construction of a 3D firearm.

Let me be clear, this law isn’t indented to “criminalize” purchasing of a firearm on the internet, 3D or not. New Jersey already has one of the most stringent and regressive firearm laws in the country.

This law is about the mere communication with another individual in regards to printing out a 3D firearm.

The legislation was apparently in response to a little known non-profit defense firm in Austin, Texas called Defense Distributed. The company had the audacity to provide instructions for individuals who wanted to try their hand at printing a 3-D firearm.

This apparently sent Democratic controlled lawmakers in Trenton into overdrive, drafting legislation that would certainly infringe on both our First and Second Amendment rights.

Moreover the law has written, whether by mistake or by design is a lot more egregious to free-speech, then one would think. In that the legislators within the Garden-State could have simply banned the manufacture of 3-D printed firearms within its borders, without fanfare. And most likely if challenged by pro-gun activists, New Jersey would most likely win

However New Jersey lawmakers didn’t do that, going beyond the threshold of Jurisprudence. In short they overreached and went overboard in their frenzied zeal, by banning the “facilitation” of manufacturing such a firearm by making it illegal to “distribute by any means, including the Internet, plans on how to print a 3-D gun to a person in New Jersey.

This egregious law if permitted to stand would actually criminalize everything from engineering books detailing the process of the 3-D printing of firearms for educational purposes, to hosting digital copies of 3-D printed gun designs regardless of where someone is in the world.

The intended “slippery-slop” created by New Jersey legislators, perhaps hoping no one would catch on, would be the beginning of the end regarding anything related to firearms on the internet, perhaps even instructional materials on the use of firearms.


  1. Bofo Nargourski

    When State governments pass laws in violation of the Constitution people got to jail unless they have enough money to fight it in court. How did this happen

  2. AMBASSADOR MOUNT William Mount


  3. Dan

    How can N.J. charge a person with the crime by e mail . I email every day and have no clue what state the e Mail going to. That just one oversight. Where is the intent ? Would another state honor the arrest warrant from N.J. and enforce exerdiction .? New Jersey has enough problems best leave them there.

  4. Bill

    Eff them all and the war is knocking at there door and it will come for Ll of them each and everyone of them will charged with treason and hanged by there rotten necks as well as their families

  5. James Russell

    You guys in the State. You’re setting yourselves up for failure. Realize the oaths you took. Protect the American citizens…regardless of your political, religious, or social opinions or beliefs. These are protected under the Constitution, and should be administered accordingly. Thank you. Any ?’s. Email me. Bye.

  6. Bill

    This happened because politicans as a whole, and Democrats in particular believe that they can act with impunity because they are so superior to the great unwashed.
    The prudent legislators do well to remember; when the pendulum swings back to the right, it does so with a profound effect, and the consequences are generally brutal.

  7. Alfred

    There has never been a government that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
    Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
    Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
    The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
    The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
    The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
    Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
    Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
    Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
    There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
    The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
    Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
    Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.

    the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH INALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.

  8. Rumplestiltskin

    Those left leaning progressive socialist believe that if they can take all the guns they won’t have live in fear, that somebody would shoot them just on general principles. They should be afraid now, because if they pass any law that undermines our Constitution they could be brought up on charges of Treason and shot anyway by firing squad. Hey ass holes, you don’t mess with our Constitution or you’ll pay the price right along with your families. CAPICHE ?

    It is time for Americans to stop being afraid of what needs to be said. If the Government can assassinate those who force their criminal behavior out into the open, WE CAN DO THE SAME !! AND< this goes for state governments as well.

    So I'll say it again, you don't mess with our Constitution. Now, what part of that do your morons not understand ?

  9. Arizona


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright Stella Management 2018, all rights reserved